tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post1978278391641050288..comments2024-03-27T15:43:53.969-04:00Comments on Adventures in Autism: Today Show Part 2: AAP President Tells Giant Easily Disprovable MistruthGinger Taylorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04200286625735078479noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-88559314684071338322021-07-05T18:03:36.333-04:002021-07-05T18:03:36.333-04:00
I was diagnosed as HEPATITIS B carrier in 2013 wi...<br />I was diagnosed as HEPATITIS B carrier in 2013 with fibrosis of the<br />liver already present. I started on antiviral medications which<br />reduced the viral load initially. After a couple of years the virus<br />became resistant. I started on HEPATITIS B Herbal treatment from<br />ULTIMATE LIFE CLINIC (www.ultimatelifeclinic.com) in March, 2020. Their<br />treatment totally reversed the virus. I did another blood test after<br />the 6 months long treatment and tested negative to the virus. Amazing<br />treatment! This treatment is a breakthrough for all HBV carriers.<br />MATINAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10558912772822043673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-68049358874136990702012-05-28T15:27:26.443-04:002012-05-28T15:27:26.443-04:00His complete response:
"Yes. I think any of ...His complete response:<br /><br />"Yes. I think any of the vaccines we have today have been tested and proven to be safe, and the credible studies don't show any relationship between vaccines and permanent injury. So we favor this and we know that unless we have vaccination rates that are in the 90 to 95% range we are not going to prevent epidemics from coming into this country of measles, of polio, from countries where these diseases are still endemic. So its very important that we vaccinate all our children."<br /><br />--------------------<br /><br />Where are those said credible studies? Where? Why can they not produce them and show that the study design holds and has held merit. How long were any studies following the study subjects? What physiological safety evidence was collected on any subject, and where is their complete blood work files, as well; before and after. How about doing live darkfield blood microscopy on 100 children that received 5 or more vaccines in one visit; before and after. <br /><br />www.vacfacts.infoAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01994408775442932089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-68353848067092634002008-08-10T05:28:00.000-04:002008-08-10T05:28:00.000-04:00There is no such thing as a safe vaccine, and ther...There is no such thing as a safe vaccine, and there is plenty of evidence (eg David Ayoub) that they put the mercury in to make them more toxic among other reasons eg anti-fertility, depopulation. And there is no such thing as an effective vaccine, they suppress one and another increases.<BR/><BR/>And the other biggy (as Stan says) is the fact they have known vitamin C is a cure for all infections, known since 1949 (Klenner), such as meningitis (Kalokerinos), Polio, measles etc, while it will prevent all cot-deaths (Kalokerinos), known for 30 years. <BR/><BR/>Just that would make vaccination completely unecessary, as Dr levy says:<BR/><BR/>"Many viral infectious diseases have been cured and can continue to be cured by the proper administration of Vitamin C. Yes, the vaccinations for these treatable infectious diseases are completely unnecessary when one has the access to proper treatment with vitamin C. And, yes, all the side effects of vaccinations...are also completely unnecessary since the vaccinations do not have to be given in the first place with the availability of properly dosed vitamin C."---Dr Thomas Levy M.D., J.D. (Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases and Toxins p30)<BR/><BR/>Just another ugly truth to consider when they go on about wanting to save childrens lives with vaccines.<BR/><BR/>The herd immunity bull is just the lie they use to encourage high vaccine uptake. The main reason is the fact they don't want any large groups of healthy unvaccinated kids around to show up vaccination, like the Amish.<BR/><BR/>"The reason vaccinations are promoted with such intensity is to prevent people from realising that vaccines do not protect and also in the event of an outbreak or an epidemic the vaccinated are as much at risk of becoming infected as the unvaccinated. The truth can be kept hidden if people's vaccination status remains unknown and if everyone is vaccinated, making a comparison with unvaccinated people impossible. This is also the real reason for the relentless push to vaccinate as many children as possible."-- Dr Buchwald (The Decline of Tuberculosis despite "Protective" Vaccination by Dr. Gerhard Buchwald M.D. p101)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-21162244264960217992008-08-10T04:49:00.000-04:002008-08-10T04:49:00.000-04:00They have been lying for 200 years regarding vacci...They have been lying for 200 years regarding vaccine injury, and the smallpox stats showed mid 19 century that smallpox vaccine was useless and dangerous so they have known for 150 years vaccines are ineffective. <BR/><BR/>In 1880 the National Anti-Vaccine League stated:<BR/><BR/>"Another Parliamentary return (No. 443, Session 1877) demonstrates that 25,000 babies are yearly sacrificed by diseases excited by Vaccination." <BR/><BR/>Also proven easily by Leicester stats where they found they lost 2,200 less babies under 5 when they didn't vaccinate (30 years) compared to their high vaccination years.<BR/><BR/>Just the tip of the iceberg as far as smallpox vax goes--think also of spreading leprosy, smallpox, syphilis around the world for over 100 years.<BR/><BR/>And that, smallpox vaccination, is the keystone of vaccination, which itself is the keystone to Allopathy. Just one big fat lie that the rest sit on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-48922999491828580982008-05-16T11:47:00.000-04:002008-05-16T11:47:00.000-04:00Good comments here, esp. from Jim; to whom (& to ...Good comments here, esp. from Jim; to whom (& to others) I would like to say that there is actually a known antiviral treatment for polio, & which in fact was known about at the time of the dev. of the vaccine. That is very large doses of vitamin C. A doctor in South Carolina by the name of Fred Klenner came up with the treatment, and was getting excellent results - when the vaccine came on the market. And in the competition between a natural, non-patentable substance and a pharmaceutical product.....and don't we know the results of that sort of story.<BR/>As for other of the ch. diseases, there is: vitamin A/cod liver oil for measles; colloidal silver for the DPT triad; the list goes on, of other natural anti-virals and -bacterials & immune enhancers, like olive leaf extract, grapefruit seed extract, astragalus, various mushrooms....in short, we would NOt be left high and dry if the full truth about vaccines got out, and parents started voting with their feet in such numbers as to undercut the 'herd immunity' levels. Point: to force the authorities to come up with safer vaccines, or face a rebellion of the herd. Who finally got mad as hell and weren't going to take it any more.Stanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13685583498340286004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-26338618314948046162008-03-13T01:48:00.000-04:002008-03-13T01:48:00.000-04:00It is good to know that I am not the only one that...It is good to know that I am not the only one that thought that Dr. Tayloe sounded incompetent. I liked reading your interpretation, thanks! <BR/>I actually had my babies 9 month well baby check today, during which I asked my Pediatrician how I can find out more specifics about what exactly is in each individual vaccine and he acted like he had never been asked this before and after thinking for a minute he said he could give me the pack inserts. For some reason he didn't have all of them, but he gave me several. I thought it was interesting that you posted from them today. I also asked him about specifics like them having formaldehyde and aluminum and he said he wasn't aware of that. It seems to me that our leaders in childcare need to do more research for themselves rather than just listening to what they are told.Aliciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15065217209789755563noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-48194399469689334592008-03-12T18:34:00.000-04:002008-03-12T18:34:00.000-04:00It's ironic that the AAP is bending over backwards...It's ironic that the AAP is bending over backwards (and breaking it's back it seems) trying to "reassure" parents that vaccines are *completely* safe. They probably fear the parents won't vaccinate their kids *at all*.<BR/><BR/> Of course, we all know that no drug, including vaccines is completely safe. And as Dierdre said in the Imus interview, most parents are *not* saying "no vaccinations". What they are saying is that the need to get the toxins out, they need to spread them out, they need to reduce the schedule.. (do we really need a Rotavirus vaccination? Has Rotavirus such a huge threat in the US until the vaccine was developed in the last 2 years? Yes it kills thousands in the developing world, but here??)<BR/><BR/> So instead of reassuring parents, the AAP has, by not admitting that "yes there is some risk, and we will take your concerns seriously and talk with top pediatric immunologists in the country about when it's appropriate for vaccination to being, and how how often".. They just put their foot down and say that all vaccines are safe.<BR/><BR/> They may actually create the very situation they (I think) hope to avoid.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10951570753949444116noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-11853914521550995392008-03-12T16:42:00.000-04:002008-03-12T16:42:00.000-04:00"we know that unless we have vaccination rates tha..."we know that unless we have vaccination rates that are in the 90 to 95% range we are not going to prevent epidemics.."<BR/><BR/> HOW do we know this, I would ask? How can we *possibly* know this, unless we have run studies on large unvaccinated and vaccinated populations, BOTH in the U.S. or in countries of similar hygeinic and developmental standards.<BR/><BR/> Surely the percentage to reach "hurd immunity" is not as high as 90%?<BR/><BR/> On person mentioned (in a comment on the AgeOfAutism blog) that she has her child's Ig titers teseted and IgA - the one most responsible for the adaptive immune system's antibody response, was negative. Negative relative to a "reference range" almost certainly "correct" for adults, not 6-month old children. But still, this raises the very interesting question of *are vaccinations doing ANYTHING positive*. By positive, I mean creating immunity. Al Plethchnor, autor of Pets At Risk, runs Ig test of pets as well as antibody titer tests to test for immunity developed from vaccination. In his book, his discusses several cases where a vaccination *failed to produce an antibody response*.<BR/><BR/> This raises 2 important questions:<BR/><BR/>1) If vaccines are not doing anything useful for children in terms of creating immunity (their stated purpose), why are we using them at all? Why use them if they don't do anything but possibly create or increase disfunctions in the immune system, mitochondrial system, endocrine system, and neurological system (from the mercury, aluminum, and other toxins AND from the unnatural immunological action of the vaccine).<BR/><BR/>2) This is possibly a more interesting question: if (for instance - I don't have the DTaP vaccinations at 1, 4, and 6 months do nothing in terms of creating immunity, why don't we see raging diptheria and whooping caugh epidemics in children under 6 months? If this is true (that the vaccines before a certain age do little of nothing to create immunity), this DIRECTLY contradicts the oft-repeated "public health" statement that vaccines are necessary to prevent epidemics. You cannot prevent an epidemic without immunity, so where are the epidemics?<BR/><BR/> The is an explanation that perhaps one of the later DTaP shouts *does* create immunity, which then prevents epidemics in ADULTS which might otherwise happen, and be spread the children. If this is the case, does it not make sense to simply skip vaccinations that (most of the time) don't work before the age of 6-9 months, and only vaccinate later when the immune system is able to not only actually create immunity? At that time, the immune system might not only be ready to crate immunity, but also be able to perhaps prevent some or all of the horrific injuries that appear to be linked to vaccinations (sometimes within minutes or hours of injection) - some probably partly or fully autoimmune in nature, as seen in autism (and Type 1 diabetes, and perhaps "setting the stage" for autoimmunies which develop later)<BR/><BR/> Donald Miller MD has developed a "safe(r)" vaccination schedule (can be found at GenerationRescue) that includes only 4 vaccines, to be given separately, in a non-toxic form, using NO live viruses. These 4 are DTaP, and Polio.<BR/><BR/> This makes sense, as these four diseases are either very dangerous to a child or more virulent and likely to create an epidemic (in the case of diphtheria, pertussis, and polio. Polio and Tetanus if contracted mostly likely leave a child partly or completely crippled for life, or dead, to my knowledge (I am not aware of antibiotic/anti-vital treatment for polio or tetanus).<BR/><BR/> If indeed there is "herd immunity" among adults which prevent both adult and child outbreaks of measles, mumps, etc, then there is a question of vaccinating for these disease SEPARATELY and LATER IN LIFE. (Later in life people can deal with shots better than kids too, so there is less "multiple vaccine" pressure, as well as much less crying)<BR/><BR/> Of course, this entire argument rests on the idea that vaccines DO NOT by and large create immunity before a certain age. The only way to test this is to run studies on immune titers in children after vaccinations, and adults - and possibly children naturally exposed to these diseases by unvaccinated. This is the only way I can see to 1) establish whether this hypothesis is true, and 2) in order to do that, establish what appropriate antibody levels in young children/infants actually is.<BR/><BR/> And research MUST proceed toward developing way to induce immunity ("vaccinate") without using the current vaccination paradigm of infection with a low level antigen - a paradigm which is essentially unchanged since the Cowpox/Smallpox observation many years ago.<BR/><BR/> If we still want to immunize children, adolescents, or adults. The current paradigm is cheap and easy, and requires little new science be developed, but it is damaging to immidiately damaging to children (in some if not most cases), evidenced by the epidemic of autism and ADHD. The current vaccinations paradigm relies on over-stimualtion of the immune system, and possibly creates some of the other "childhood epidemics" we see - asthma, allergies, endocrine problems, and diabetes - type 1 and maybe even type 2, which is seen in younger and younger children now.<BR/><BR/> I don't have a real clue what such a new paradigm might be - but I know that it will have to come from more direct, but more subtle manipulation of the immune system to create antibodies and the B-cells to maintain "immune memory". It may also possibly involve infection of children with genetically "killed" (non-pathogenic) viruses, thus mimicking natural immunity.<BR/><BR/> But this will require much more research, research that will have to be carried out by immunologists. Immunologists could also possibly help in explaining the mechanism behind vaccine induced damage, as I think has already started to be done from a very few papers I've seen.<BR/><BR/> Where are the immunologists in this war? Aren't there at least a FEW of them that have autistic children? To paraphrase the old Army poster "This war needs them"<BR/><BR/> If you are an immunologist, or know one who is concerned, feel free to contact me to discuss this further, and about possibly setting up a "Immunologists for Safer Immunizations" movement. I am only a lay-person in this, but I know that something must change - and quickly.<BR/><BR/>~ JIm Witte<BR/>jim.witte@gmail.comJimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10951570753949444116noreply@blogger.com