The American Academy of Pediatrics now recommends (see update) that
pediatricians tell parents who don't vaccinate their children that they:
Are "Selfish"
Are "Self-Centered"
Are "Complacent or Lazy"
Are often "Emotional" decision makers
Have "Unacceptable attitudes"
But they do not believe that
insulting you like this is in any way coercing you to vaccinate your child.
Further, they kindly tell you that if you decide to only get one or two shots at a time, your child might die, but they are not trying to scare you into sticking to the full CDC schedule.
'Oh... and vaccinate or you are out of our practice and we won't recommend any other docs to you... but seriously... don't feel pressured.'
I have criticized the AAP in the past for making today's vaccine decisions based on the health threats that my father faced when he and his brother contracted polio, and lost their father to the disease, in the epidemic of the 1940's, rather than basing them on the modern heath threats my child, who contracted autism, faces a full sixty years later, in the current epidemic of developmental and immune disorders of the early 21st century.
But now they have topped themselves. In the letter that they are holding out to pediatricians as a model of what to tell their patients (from All Star Pediatrics), they are citing the small pox threat (which was eradicated 30 years ago) that Ben Franklin's son faced, and died from, in 1736!
They reiterate that they believe that neither vaccines nor thimerosal causes autism, or other any other developmental disabilities, and that "ALL children and young adults should receive ALL of the recommended vaccines according to the schedule published by the Centers for Disease Control." [emphasis mine]
This despite the
multitude of research to the contrary, and in complete
contradiction to the vaccine safety package inserts themselves that list contraindications and say that certain people should not receive certain vaccines.
All this is a part of the collaborative effort between the
AAP and other organizations (yes of course Pharma and Paul Offit are among them, I can't believe you even asked) under their new "
Childhood Immunization Support Program" or as they might as well call it, "We Know Everything and Parents Are Idiots Program".
Like pediatricians, and many of you reading this, I make my living by providing a service to people. I wonder how many of my clients and potential clients would still want to do business with me if I handed them a letter that in any way even remotely suggested that they were selfish, self-centered, complacent, lazy, emotional people with unacceptable attitudes if they didn't take my recommendations on which services of mine they should purchase? Any one of you wanna give it a try for a week in your business and see what happens?
By digging in and taking this increasingly absurd stance they are not just potentially damaging the vaccine program, they are putting at risk parents trust in their their statements about EVERYTHING. When you stand in front of your doc and hear him make the statement that vaccines have nothing to do with autism, then watch Hannah Poling get a million or so check from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund for her "autistic symptoms", then listen to the
head of the CDC explain how vaccines cause autism in the presence of mitochondrial disorders on CNN, then go back and ask him about the whole thing and hear him reiterate that vaccines don't cause autism, but this time handing you a piece of paper that insults you, are you going to take his word about about anything else?
What do they plan on doing if the VCIP Omnibus Hearings find for the petitioners with Autism?
Do they understand that they are moving from shooting themselves in the foot to shooting themselves in an artery?
Two weeks ago Jim Carrey asked, "How stupid do you think we are?"
The AAP has answered, "You are so stupid that we can not only keep telling you obviously disprovable lies, but we can also insult you, and you will not only CONTINUE to entrust your children to us, you will pay us money to do it!"
Last April the AAP took the wise step of attending the DAN! conference. They said that they were impressed and thought we were on to something.
I wrote a piece on the
AAP's chance to mend the widening rift between parents and pediatricians, and to regain the lost trust that was growing by leaps and bounds due to the obvious overstatements on vaccine safety that they were making to patients and their families.
I warned that they had a small window of opportunity to work to change course, work in good faith, and begin to make statements about the true risks of vaccination that abandons the now untenable assertion that vaccines don't cause autism or contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders. I warned that the window would only be open for a short time unless we saw real action, and would probably close around the time of the Green our Vaccines Rally if they didn't show up for us in some respect.
Well the AAP didn't show up for the rally and well... this certainly signals that the window is closed. They want it closed. And it looks like they may be locking it.
UPDATE:
An addendum to address critique that this post has received elsewhere.
-One person seems to have been concerned that I was personally insulted by the AAP and All Star Pediatrics. I want to assure that I am at peace on the matter. After having my son become sick due to AAP's bad policy, not much that they simply say about me, or people like me, hurts my feelings.
Insults given do not necessarily need to be received.
In my life, personally, I believe it is wise to work toward not being "insulted" by insults. Because really, either the person insulting you is right, and you need to do some self examination and change, or they are wrong, and (to be frank) who cares what they think about you.
In this case, I think that Dr. Dyer and his crew are wrong. Deciding not to vaccinate based on your best judgment is not selfish, self-centered, or a product of 'unacceptable attitudes'. (Come to think of it, how exactly does Dyer and company read minds to know what peoples motives are? Especially people he has never met, as the statement is a blanket one?) We are charged with making the best choices for our kids that we can given the information we have. Reducing that decision making process to the motives Dyer wants to believe are behind those decisions is just speculative bullying and communicates low regard for parents.
Especially parents who are earnestly struggling with the issue.
And it is not me being insulted that is the problem. It is the parents on the vaccine bubble. Treat their legitimate concerns with contempt and you only risk making complete vaccine refusal more widespread.
-Umbrage seems to have been taken at my use of the word "recommends" in the opening sentence, "The American Academy of Pediatrics now recommends that pediatricians tell parents who don't vaccinate their children that they..."
I am making the assumption, a reasonable one I think, that choosing only one medical practices vaccine policy letter to patients (one would think there are a thousand out there to choose from) and placing it prominently both on your newsletter and website whose purpose is to give guidance to pediatricians who are members of the AAP constitutes a 'recommendation'. If not a recommendation, it certainly represents a ringing endorsement.
For the sake of accuracy, I will contact the AAP on Monday and ask that they clarify if this was a 'recommendation' or an 'endorsement'.
But, if we can cut the crap and get real for a moment, it does not matter what semantics the AAP decides to play with this. They are holding it out for their members as an example to be followed and even if they DID run a disclaimer (which they didn't) that they don't recommended the letter at all, the message would still be loud and clear to peds.
'Feel free to insult your patients, use coercion to get them to fully vaccinate and dismiss them if they don't. We might 'have' to officially say don't do it, but really, you won't get any arguments from us! (wink)'
Kinda like the conversation I had with my seven year old yesterday, "Son, it is totally wrong to steal cars. Did I ever tell you about Jonsie "Zoom Zoom" Mcgillicutty? Man that guy was great at stealing cars. Here is what he did... now here is how you jimmy the lock to break in... and here is how you hot wire it... and once you have the car you..."
They can say all day they want their docs to 'work with' parents, but what they DO gives us the real message of what they are all about. And what they have DONE is tell peds how to treat patients with earnest vaccine concerns with contempt.
Addendum:
Links to the AAP Newsletter have disappeared, so I am copying the letter here in case the rest do as well:
"
All Star Pediatrics’ Vaccine Policy
Statement
Editor’s note: The following document is available for download on
the AAP
Member Center
at www.aap.org/securemoc/immunizations/
allstarpediatrics.doc, and may be adapted for use by practices.
We firmly believe in the effectiveness of
vaccines to prevent serious
illness and to save lives.
We firmly believe in the safety of our
vaccines.
We firmly believe that all children and young
adults should receive
all of the recommended vaccines according to
the schedule published
by the Centers for Disease Control and the American Academy
of Pediatrics.
We firmly believe, based on all available
literature, evidence and
current studies, that vaccines do not cause
autism or other developmental
disabilities. We firmly believe that
thimerosal, a preservative
that has been in vaccines for decades and
remains in some vaccines,
does not cause autism or other developmental
disabilities.
We firmly believe that vaccinating children
and young adults may
be the single most important health-promoting
intervention we perform
as health care providers, and that you can
perform as parents/
caregivers. The recommended vaccines and their
schedule given
are the results of years and years of
scientific study and data-gathering
on millions of children by thousands of our
brightest scientists
and physicians.
These things being said, we recognize that
there has always been
and will likely always be controversy
surrounding vaccination. Indeed,
Benjamin Franklin, persuaded by his brother,
was opposed to smallpox
vaccine until scientific data convinced him
otherwise. Tragically,
he had delayed inoculating his favorite son
Franky, who contracted
smallpox and died at the age of 4, leaving Ben
with a lifetime
of guilt and remorse. Quoting Mr. Franklin’s
autobiography:
In 1736, I lost one of my sons, a fine boy of four years old, by
the
smallpox…I long regretted bitterly, and still regret that I had
not given
it to him by inoculation. This I mention for the sake of parents
who omit
that operation, on the supposition that they should never
forgive themselves
if a child died under it, my example showing that the regret may
be the same either way, and that, therefore, the safer should be
chosen.
The vaccine campaign is truly a victim of its
own success. It is
precisely because vaccines are so effective at
preventing illness that
we are even discussing whether or not they
should be given. Because
of vaccines, many of you have never seen a
child with polio, tetanus,
whooping cough, bacterial meningitis or even
chickenpox, or known
a friend or family member whose child died of
one of these diseases.
Such success can make us complacent or even
lazy about vaccinating.
But such an attitude, if it becomes
widespread, can only lead to
tragic results.
Over the past several years, many people in Europe have chosen
not to vaccinate their children with the MMR
vaccine af ter publication
of an unfounded suspicion (later re tracted)
that the vaccine
caused autism. As a result of
underimmunization, there have been
small outbreaks of measles and several deaths
from complications of
measles in Europe
over the past several years.
Furthermore, by not vaccinating your child you
are taking selfish
advantage of thousands of others who do
vaccinate their children,
which decreases the likelihood that your child
will contract
one of these diseases. We feel such an
attitude to be self-centered and
unacceptable.
We are making you aware of these facts not to
scare you or coerce
you, but to emphasize the importance of vaccinating
your child.
We recognize that the choice may be a very
emotional one for some
parents. We will do everything we can to
convince you that vaccinating
according to the schedule is the right thing
to do. However,
should you have doubts, please discuss these
with your health care
provider in advance of your visit. In some cases, we may alter the
schedule to accommodate parental concerns or
reservations. Please
be advised, however, that delaying or “breaking
up the vaccines”
to give one or two at a time over two or more
visits goes against
expert recommendations, and can put your
child at risk for serious
illness (or even death) and goes against our
medical advice as
providers at All Star Pediatrics. Such additional visits will require
additional co-pays on your part. Furthermore,
please realize that
you will be required to sign a “Refusal to
Vaccinate” acknowledgement
in the event of lengthy delays.
Finally, if you should absolutely refuse to
vaccinate your child
despite all our efforts, we will ask you to
find another health care
provider who shares your views. We do not keep
a list of such
providers, nor would we recommend any such
physician. Please recognize
that by not vaccinating you are putting your
child at unnecessary
risk for life-threatening illness and
disability, and even death.
As medical professionals, we feel very
strongly that vaccinating
children on schedule with currently available
vaccines is absolutely
the right thing to do for all children and
young adults. Thank you
for your time in reading this policy, and
please feel free to discuss
any questions or concerns you may have about
vaccines with any
one of us.
Sincerely,
Bradley J. Dyer, M.D.
Jennifer Melnychuk, M.D.
Robert C. Duncheskie,
M.D."
