tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post5164881765208796466..comments2024-03-27T15:43:53.969-04:00Comments on Adventures in Autism: FDA Proposes Dangerous Vaccine Rule ChangeGinger Taylorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04200286625735078479noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-47285159107340533212010-06-23T10:16:00.666-04:002010-06-23T10:16:00.666-04:00"new technologies"????
Shouldn't yo..."new technologies"????<br /><br />Shouldn't you call them "random novel experimental compounds previously unknown to mankind whose long term side effects are completely unknown but will certainly be cheaper for pharma to use so they are gonna try to sneak them in and when word gets out they will try to sell them to the public by calling them 'new technology'?"<br /><br />The vaccine program is a disaster. Pharma is a run away train that does not know or care what their 'new technology' is doing to children. $$$<br /><br />Sales pitch fail.Ginger Taylorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04200286625735078479noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-30226670460215757572010-06-23T09:02:38.081-04:002010-06-23T09:02:38.081-04:00Sheldon has infinite faith in the goodness of the ...Sheldon has infinite faith in the goodness of the government agencies and the pharma companies when it comes to vaccines. I've run into him in other places. <br /><br />It is okay Sheldon. Even if you were totally right about squalene and thimerosal in this particular case, once the oversight is loosened just about anything could be shoved into vaccines and approved by that single FDA employee. Whatever happened to checks and balances?Minorityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12834476072596898758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-65846500563844359752010-06-23T08:58:40.116-04:002010-06-23T08:58:40.116-04:00Actually, to my understanding many vaxes DO contai...Actually, to my understanding many vaxes DO contain thimerosal, but since it is only in "trace" amounts, it doesn't have to be labeled... <br /><br />PERFECT, people keep living w/the false assumption that there is no mercury in vaes, so then they falsely believe vaxes don't cause autism... I mean since there is no publicly known mercury in vaxes any more (minus the flu shot & H1N1) & autism is still occurring like gang busters, there is no connection (**wink, wink**)...makes perfect sense!! Surely big pharma nor big bro would never **gulp** lie to us, right?!?!? They know what is best for us & our kids... baaaaahhh, baaaaahhhh!! <br /><br />Furthermore, aluminum is at least equal to thimerosal if not more dangerous in many ways... so not only is there a "trace" amount of mercury, I mean NO mercury, but now there is yet ANOTHER neurotoxin in them, PERFECT (**sarcasm**)!!<br /><br />"Changing a vaccine that doesn't contain a squalene based adjuvant to one that does would be a change in safety and effectiveness."<br /><br />WHAT?!?!? Squalene is DANGEROUS!! It makes vaccines more effective?? You mean even more damaging & deadly?!?!?<br /><br />What makes anybody assume that big pharma wants to make anything "safer??" I mean seriously, why would they want to use toxic-less techonology?!?!? This is NOT about using any new techonology that would make things safer or to be able to make vaxes w/out thimerosal... and even if they did have a plan for something as such, I am sure somehow it would make the vax cocktail even more deadly... it also opens up Pandora's box for all kinds of unregulated, untested (I know... as if they truly test anything using ethical means & UNbiased studies as is it is), UNsafe vaxes, drugs, etc.<br /><br />I find this VERY disturbing!!WiseMamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06386106149371507037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-10939638385060259652010-06-23T04:03:28.787-04:002010-06-23T04:03:28.787-04:00NVIC should be supporting this change.
The langua...NVIC should be supporting this change.<br /><br />The language doesn't apply to the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine itself. Changing a vaccine that doesn't contain a squalene based adjuvant to one that does would be a change in safety and effectiveness.<br /><br />What it will allow is what vaccination opponents should love --- no more thimerosal in vaccines, even the flu vaccine in 10 dose vial. Current regulations require a preservative in 10 dose vials. If you have a technology that allows you to attach a device to the top of a 10 dose vial and allow it to be used multiple times and still keep the vial aseptic, then you don't need thimerosal. This change allows for easy adoption of this type of technology.<br /><br />I don't know if Ms. Fisher doesn't understand this or wants to keep her followers upsetAJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08956843341571887209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-8225314170492573002010-06-23T02:18:13.353-04:002010-06-23T02:18:13.353-04:00Ginger:
The speed of the revolving door between U...Ginger:<br /><br />The speed of the revolving door between USCDC/USFDA and Pharma apparently needs to be turned up a notch-FDA vaccine Czar today, Pharma president of vaccine sales tomorrow.Jim Thompsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15642258492097029918noreply@blogger.com