tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post4958622345519414579..comments2024-03-19T03:20:27.414-04:00Comments on Adventures in Autism: Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?Ginger Taylorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04200286625735078479noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-37832490701491457632011-12-16T07:11:39.486-05:002011-12-16T07:11:39.486-05:00FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT AUTISM.<a href="http://myhealthcarezone.com/autism.html" rel="nofollow">FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT AUTISM.</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-36417289038277847082011-12-08T04:27:35.864-05:002011-12-08T04:27:35.864-05:00FOR INFORMATION ABOUT AUTISM.<a href="http://myhealthcarezone.com/types-of-autism.html" rel="nofollow"><br />FOR INFORMATION ABOUT AUTISM.</a>Shahrukhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04450710318742632036noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-12039735456604317322011-11-24T02:25:07.483-05:002011-11-24T02:25:07.483-05:00Ginger, you are amazing - you have a way of findin...Ginger, you are amazing - you have a way of finding the big stuff like this one. <br /><br />The vaccine empire guys like to isolate evidence that satisfies a singular element of the Bradford-Hill criteria and declare it to be invalid because it does not prove causation. <br /><br />For example, the argument is out there that the temporal relationship between well baby visits and onset of regressive autism is given to chance equal to a coin toss, and therefore is not valid evidence. But a temporal relationship IS one of the elements upon which to base a conclusion of causation. (An effect that becomes evident before treatment with a suspected cause proves absence of causation.) <br /><br />What would Sir Austin Bradford-Hill have had to say to these empire guys about dismissing evidence by isolating his elements of causation? <br /><br />I would like to quote his 1965 essay. "Here then are nine different view points from all of which we should study association before we cry causation. What I do not believe - and this has been suggested - that we can usefully lay down some hard and fast rules that must be obeyed before we can accept cause and effect. None of my nine viewpoints can bring indisputable evidence for or against the cause and effect hypothesis and none can be required as sine qua non. What they can do, with greater or less strength, is to help us make up our minds on the fundamental question - is there any other way of explaining the set of facts before us, is there any other answer equally, or more, likely than cause and effect?"<br /><br />The question that should follow is whether the strength of the evidence and gravity of the effect outweigh the risk of a remedial action taken in error. <br /><br />What would be the risk to a baby of withholding adjuvented vaccines given for the protection of the community until after such an age that the blood brain barrier is mature? <br /><br />For example, why give the neonatal hepatitis B vaccine series when the child has almost zero chance of acquiring hepatitis B? (Am I going to hear the argument that the mother may pass hep B to the child? Hope not.) <br /><br />Long BEFORE a case control study is ever done (as the authors appropriately suggest), the results of this inquiry indicate such changes in the current immunization practices.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17072726941610809454noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-85855497520379714172011-11-23T11:08:37.624-05:002011-11-23T11:08:37.624-05:00I firmly believe that aluminum was the issue for m...I firmly believe that aluminum was the issue for my son. He only received one vaccine, the neonate dose of Hep B. The particular one he got contained 500mcg of aluminum rather than the usual 250mcg. He was in NICU within an hour of receiving that shot.Pw'eek_The_Cleverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13797313068412584492noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7771487.post-3929211684515326162011-11-22T12:44:24.061-05:002011-11-22T12:44:24.061-05:00I wonder how long it will be before Orac and his s...I wonder how long it will be before Orac and his slobbering dolts will dismiss this as pseudoscience (by not reading it, of course). $5 says that Dorkski will be spewing about how the author of this study is "anti-vaccine" because the idiot doesn't like the results. Especially since the study doesn't agree with his own confirmation bias.MySocratesNotehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01823121688925710624noreply@blogger.com